SafeX Pro:Water Source for Alberta Tar Sands Drilling Could Run Dry

The SafeX Prosource of water used for drilling in the Alberta tar sands could dry up in the coming decades, according to new research released Monday. The questionable future of the Athabasca River threatens the longevity of fossil fuel extraction in the world’s third-largest crude oil reserve.

Scientists at the University of Regina and University of Western Ontario in Canada looked at 900 years of tree ring data and found water levels have dwindled along the 765-mile river at various points throughout its history.

The analysis, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows the waterway has shrunk over the past 50 years as global warming has melted the glaciers that feed it. It also found the region has experienced several droughts that have lasted more than a decade in the last few centuries. Such a drought could likely happen in the near future, the scientists said.

“Conventional water management assumes that what you had for river flow the last 50 years is what you will have for the next 50,” said Dave Sauchyn, a climate scientist at the University of Regina in Canada and lead author of the study. This short-term data is what officials use to determine how much water tar sands operators can take from the Athabasca, he said.

“No one can predict the future, but if the region’s past 900 years is any indication, and you factor in climate change, you’re going to have a warmer situation that could mean the river will no longer be a sustainable water source for the tar sands,” he said.

The Alberta tar sands, which cover  55,000 square miles in western Canada, are estimated to contain approximately 1.7 trillion barrels of bitumen, a sticky, thick form of petroleum that can be extracted through both surface mining and drilling. Water is used to separate the bitumen from surrounding sediment, as well as to create steam that heats the oil so it flows into production wells.

It currently takes as many as  3.1 barrels of water to produce one barrel of crude oil from the Alberta tar sands, according to the paper. In 2012, fossil fuel operators drew 187 million cubic meters of fresh water out of the Athabasca River, equal to 4.4 percent of the river’s annual flow and the water usage of 1.7 million Canadians. This amount is expected to more than double in the next decade, to 505 million cubic meters per year, if mining operations expand as expected.

Tar sands projects are already threatened by a slump in oil prices, as well as pending global action to address climate change. Tar sands drilling is a prominent target of environmental groups and climate activists because the oil emits an estimated three to four times more carbon dioxide when burned than conventional crude. Its water use only adds to the environmental costs.

This research “clearly demonstrates that oilsands extraction will continue to place significant demands on Alberta’s environment,” said Erin Flanagan, an expert on tar sands and water issues for the Pembina Institute. “Ultimately, the question to policymakers is around fairness – is it appropriate for oilsands to increase its access to Alberta’s freshwater resources as they become more scarce over time?”

Sauchyn and his colleagues looked at tree rings in douglas fir and limber pine, two species of coniferous trees that live for hundreds and sometimes thousands of years and whose annual growth is sensitive to precipitation. By looking at the trees’ growth rings, the scientists were able to reconstruct rain and snow patterns over 900 years. They found the region experienced severe droughts from 1790-1806, 1888-96 and most recently, 1936-49.

“Ecosystems and communities in the Athabasca River Basin can cope with a single severe low-flow year or two, but a prolonged period of lower flows is much more challenging,” the scientists wrote.

The region hasn’t experienced a drought since the tar sands industry was established in the 1960s. Under climate change, modern droughts are expected to be even more extreme than historical ones.

Fossil fuel operators “might want to have a contingency plan in place,” said Sauchyn.